Tag-Archive for ◊ protection ◊

22 Feb 2009 Copyright and the photographer
 |  Category: general, legal  | Tags: , , ,  | Leave a Comment

Suwanee waves

Suwanee waves

So Just what is a Copyright?

Copyright is a form of protection provided by the laws of the United States(title 17, U. S. Code) to the authors of “original works of authorship,” including literary, dramatic, musical, artistic, and certain other intellectual works. This protection is available to both published and unpublished works.§

Copyright is actually included as a right in the US Constitution: Article I, Section 8, Clause 8

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.

The owner of a copyright is the only one who can legally:

  • Reproduce the work
  • Make Derivative Works
  • Sell or otherwise distribute copies
  • Display the work publicly

Who can obtain a Copyright to a particular work?

Copyright protection subsists from the time the work is created in fixed form. The copyright in the work of authorship immediately becomes the property of the author who created the work. Only the author or those deriving their rights through the author can rightfully claim copyright.§

That means the instant you press that shutter button the Copyright instantly becomes your property unless a few special circumstances are in effect. This has been true for any work created after March of 1989. The exemptions mainly involve working for someone else where your primary job is to take photographs or if you sign a contract before the images are created that gives someone else the right to them. You can license your rights to some of your work either in full or for certain limited usage. A Copyright lasts for the length of the authors life plus 70 years at this time.

I noted the reasons why this right is essentially unenforceable for the average person in the first post on this subject. You can get much greater protection by registering your copyright with the US Copyright Office. Doing this gives you:

  • A public record of the copyright
  • It is required before you can sue someone for infringement
  • If you register within 90 days after publication of the work, you may recover legal fees and the higher damage levels mentioned in the DMCA post are in effect

The downside is that you have to do this every 90 days and it will cost you $45 every time you do it. $180/year, and again this means to me that it makes little sense unless you are making or expect to be making money from your work sometime in the future. You can do the registration either via mail or using the new planned online system. That may be slightly cheaper. The US Copyright Office has a lot of very readable information on this process and has answers for just about any question that you could think about asking. It is a very well done site and you should read some of their material for a better understanding of the process.

As we all have seen from some recent high profile shenanigans copyright law can get very complicated and this is one area where you seriously need a specialized attorney if you get involved in the legal system. They call themselves IP or Intellectual Property attorneys. For more info on that see the PhotoAttorney blog in the sidebar.

Fair Use

So just what is Fair Use? It is not a right, it is a legal defense that someone being sued for infringement may make to the judge. It basically allows people to use a portion of someones work for eductional or editorial use. But it cannot cause the owner of the copyright to lose an opportunity to generate income from his work. There are various legal tests that the judge will apply, but basically it is anything that a judge says it is.  Wikipedia has a very long article on this issue that you may want to read.

Next up is the Orphan Works act that at the time of this writing has not been passed yet. But it is something that we need to prepare for in advance since there are very powerful interests pushing for its passage.

This series started with this post

§ From the Copyright Office’s publications

19 Feb 2009 Protecting your work online
 |  Category: general, legal  | Tags: , , , , ,  | 2 Comments

Greek Shrine

Greek Shrine

Protecting your photos online

Is this a distant concern, do your really need to worry about people appropriating your work? Unfortunately the answer is that it happens every day. I hear reports all the time of people finding their work on other people’s websites. Indeed there are whole websites that not only post stolen images but provide tools to make it easier for their users to take images.

There is a tool, in beta at the time of this writing, which will search some of the web, for your images. It is called TinEye .

TinEye will scan for your image across the part of the web that it has so far indexed. The number of indexed sites seems to be limited right now but hopefully it will expand. The service scans for a digital fingerprint of the image not for the image title.

In the US and many other countries your photos are copyrighted the instant that you press the shutter button. And even though they are copyrighted, the images are essentially unprotected since there is no enforcement mechanism in place to protect your rights. Copyright violations are a civil matter in almost all cases. And being a civil matter; that means that it is up to you to protect your own rights by bringing a suit in court.

The problem is this. Most of the time people who steal your images will not be living anywhere near where you are. They will often be in a different state and sometimes will be in a different country. That means a trip down to your local small claims court won’t get you anything in your pocket or force them to stop using your image. And in the state that I live in, it can cost well over a $100 to file in small claims court. So your next step involves getting a lawyer to do the suing for you.

No surprise, but lawyers like to get paid for working. And unless you are going to pay one out of your own pocket, and that can easily amount to thousands of dollars, they want to see some profitable result at the end of the process. That would mean they need to see a big judgment ahead that they will split with you as payment for their efforts.

However with the type of copyright that attaches to your images when you press the shutter button, all you can expect to get from a court is your actual damages. You have to prove that you lost money by someone taking your image. That is fine if you are a well known photographer who gets $10,000 to take photos of some celebrity. But for the other 999 out of a 1000 photographers that means you would only recover a pittance, chicken feed and chump change. You could spend $1000 in legal costs and recover $25. Not so good.

There are a several things you can do to protect yourself. None is perfect but they can improve your chances of stopping theft. Or possibly you could even profit from the theft. I’ll cover those starting in the next post.

Let me post the obligatory I’m not a lawyer notice. I’m not one and you are always better of paying one to advise you. Poorer but better. Unless you hire Huey, Dewie, Cheatum and Howe.

UPDATE:

Someone mentioned in a comment that PicScout is available to search the web for your images. I took a look at their site at:

PicScout

However for photographers it seems to be limited to commercial sites only and costs $15/month for up to 500 photos. Their site makes it quite difficult to figure out exactly what they are offering.

Digimarc has been around for a long time, Photoshop users used to get a free plugin and short subscription to the service:

Digimarc

Digimarc seems to be more powerful than PicScout, but since I’m not quite sure what PicScout offers, that could be wrong. Digimarc embeds a invisible watermark on your images via a Photoshop plugin. They track where your image appears on the web and users can read that info via a utility. Again this is a paid and quite pricey service. Neither of these makes any sense to me, except for people who are making quite a bit of money from the sales of their work online. Probably you would have to be making thousands of dollars to see a return on these services.

Another update: I lost all the comments after upgrading Wordpress so the comment with the suggestion has vanished